limit of the blackjack table, why? Is it to prevent a player to double his total hands until he lost earlier gains. This seems to be a viable strategy, similar to the "martingale" method. It does not seem likely that you could lose 6 or 7 times while playing 21. And when you do win it would cover all the loses over the same amount as the benefit because you double bet each loss totals.
Is this a feasible strategy? Are there any casinos that have no limits on the blackjack table?
All casinos have limits on the tables.
If you play in the high roller section, they may have very high upper limits (and the ability to make Paris more on request), but they will then have a negotiable minimum bet.
Martingale simply does not.
$ 10
$ 20
$ 40
$ 80
160 USD
$ 320
$ 640
$ 1,280
There are seven paris you mentioned. If you were to lose all (which granted is unlikely), you would be $ 2,640. You would place a bet just $ 2,650 to around the same. If you have a situation where you need to split or double, you'd save $ 5,120 in the game is just not good.
Casinos keep you from doing this by having a lower and upper on the table.
You'd better learn a game where the house does not care if you win, like poker.
If you have never lost 7 hands in a row in blackjack, you have not played much. It happens all the time, and usually before you come so close to winning enough to compensate for a series that hits the limit of the table.
Seriously, go get a computer game of blackjack, or simply facing a game with a deck of cards. I really do not understand why people come here to ask whether a Martigale, or any other system of Paris, works without trying it first.
The next time you find a magic strategy that you think works, try to 10,000 or more hands before assuming it can not fail.
Posted on June 28, 2010.
